🎓 AI Cheating: The New Crisis in Colleges

The university campus is buzzing these days.

A group cheating incident using Chat GPT occurred at Yonsei University. Students were caught submitting AI-generated answers as their own,

raising the question, “How should education adapt in the AI era?”

​Shortly after, a similar incident occurred at Korea University. During an online exam,

evidence showed students exchanging questions and answers in a KakaoTalk open chat room. Ultimately, the school canceled the exam in full.

This is no longer just an academic dishonesty issue. AI is shaking up the very evaluation methods of schools.

🤔 In the AI era, the criteria for evaluation are changing.

Currently, tests focus on ‘how quickly you can get the right answer.’

However, AI already knows most of the answers.

Therefore, moving forward, “how you think” will become more important than “what you know.”

The College Entrance Exam in 2035 might become an ‘exam that evaluates thought processes.’

👩‍🏫 Teachers, students, and EdTech must change together.

👩‍🏫 For Teachers

​Instead of banning AI, we need lessons that develop thinking skills through AI.

Instead of letting students simply write down AI responses,

ask, “Why is this answer correct?”, “Is there another way?”

Encourage critical thinking together.

​At Quewrite, teachers can easily observe students' writing process and thought flow,

comparing AI-generated sentences with those written by students for feedback.

​👨‍🎓 For Students

AI is not a ‘shortcut.’

True learning happens in the process of expressing your own thoughts. AI can provide answers but cannot replace your 'why'.

Future exams will focus on evaluating thought processes and attitude over correct answers.

​💻 The role of EdTech and Quewrite

​Quewrite does not see AI as a ‘dangerous technology’ or a source of cheating.

Instead, it views AI as a partner that helps students think independently and use AI responsibly.

​Teachers can track students' writing flow and thought changes within Quewrite,

and students practice keeping their personal thoughts at the center, even with AI assistance.

​What we hope for is not “students who use AI well,”

but students who can think more deeply alongside AI. 🌱

This is the environment Quewrite aims to foster, the true learning of the AI era.

✏️ Conclusion - Education that grows with AI, not blocking it

This incident presents us with important questions.

How should education evaluate students in the AI era?”

​Not education that bans AI, but education that critically uses AI and expands thinking.

The college entrance exam and school evaluations must change in that direction.

And in preparing for these changes, at the forefronts with teachers and students, Quewrite will always be there.

​